I just received my Apple Watch Series 8.
This is my 3rd Apple Watch. I started with the original (not the Series 1). About four years ago, I moved to the Series 4.
I still have the first watch. I am trading in the Series 4. Here’s hoping for a number of years with the Series 8.
I toyed with the idea of buying the Apple Watch Ultra, but I could not convince myself of the $799 price tag. Too much for a watch. In fact, the Apple Watch, in general, is too much for a watch.
For the past two years, I have used the M1 MacBook Air as my desktop. The Air replaced an aging 27″ iMac 2013. In general, the M1 Air performed the role of desktop well with certain drawbacks.
The m1 MacBook Air comes with two Thunderbolt ports and nothing else. In order to use the Air as a desktop, I had to add the use of the OWC Thunderbolt 3 dock. While the new dock provided the needed capabilities, it also led to the next drawback.
When you add a dock, you also add the clutter. Along with the Twelve South BookArc for the Air, the external drives and cables plugged into the dock consumed a large amount of desk space.
One drawback that cannot be solved by the Apple M1 architecture is the lack of virtualization support for Intel-based Virtual Machines (VMs). I note this as “VirtualBox”, but it also applies the ParallelsDesktop for Mac. In my move to Apple M1, I had to abandon a number of VMs I used from time to time.
I did install Parallels Desktop for Mac with M1 support along with the ARM version of Microsoft Windows 10 and Microsoft Windows 11. But to solve the VirtualBox issue, I added a low cost mini desktop, the MinisForum HM90.
With the mini PC, I salvaged the use of my collection of VirtualBox VMs. The mini PC provides a well-performing solution.
But running VMs on the AIR proved to be challenging for the 16 GB of RAM available to the Air. In general, the system performed well, but there were times when memory levels were taxed.
For 2023, I decided to replace the Air with a new Mac. For that new Mac, I chose the 2022 Mac Studio base model. The base model provided solutions to most of the drawbacks.
Ample ports on the Mac Studio. I added even more with the addition of the QwiizLab USB-C dock. The dock added even more ports, but, more importantly, it provided a means to eliminate…
With the QwiizLab USB-C dock, I added a 2.5″ and a M/2 nVME SSD drives. Now I have fewer external drives hanging off the computer.
The 32 GB of memory available on the Mac Studio base model appears to have calmed the stormy sea of RAM use.
I am now left with my final and, at present, insurmountable issue of running Intel-based VMs. The MinisForum HM90 is still providing the solution for this drawback.
I freely admit that the replacement of the 2020 MacBook Air with the 2022 Mac Studio was more a case of wanting new hardware than a “must have” decision for support my work flow. But, I am pleased with the outcome.
At the end of December, 2020, my Mac desktop configuration transitioned from a 2013 27″ iMac to a new M1 MacBook Air.
The desktop configuration consists of:
I am about to reach the one month mark. All is well. In fact, all is better than well. One benefit that I did not consider was the ability to install and run IOS applications. There were several iPad application that I had wished I could run on my Mac. Now I can.
Most IOS apps are unique with no native Mac app equivalent. A few have a Mac app version, but the iPad version is superior. One such app is WeatherBug.
Now, I can unplug one USB-C cable and take my “desktop” with me.
Well, Apple did it again.
In 2013, Apple upgraded the MacOS to Mountain Lion MacOS 10.8). At the time, I was using the original Mac Pro from 2006.
To my chagrin, I found that the new OS required a 64-bit Extensible Firmware Interface (EFI) module. The Mac Pro 2006 supported 64-bit instructions, but, for some reason, sported a 32-bit EFI. Go figure.
So, I retired my Mac Pro; replacing it with a new 2013 27″ iMac. But the replacement came after an extended struggle wherein I added hardware and performed customizations that allowed MacOS Mavericks to debut on my Mac Pro. I was happy at the moment, but this happiness dissipated when I had to contend with maintaining compatibility with OS updates. I surrendered to the inevitable and purchased the iMac. Now I could run the latest MacOS and the reduced power draw lowered my monthly utility bill by $50. Problem solved…until now.
In the fall of 2020, here comes MacOS Big Sur with a bevy of new features… and a bevy of older Macs that fell off the support table, including my 2013 iMac.
I toyed for a while with the “customization” that would allow the installation of Big Sur on an unsupported Mac. I even downloaded the tools and made an attempt, but could never get this or that to download. In addition, the “customization” would have to be re-applied every time Big Sur pushed out an update. I did not want the hastle.
Apple taketh away, but also giveth in the form of the new ARM-based Macs introduced at the end of 2020. I chose the get a new MacBook Air with upgrade to 16 GB RAM and a 1 TB SSD. I traded in my 2018 MacBook Air to cover the costs of the upgrades. I did not like the 2018 MacBook Air, too noisy and too little power to do much more than surf the web and read email.
Now, I am ARM’ed And Dangerous. I am using the M1 MacBook Air both as my desktop and laptop. The iMac is still hanging in there due to lack of support by the M1 for OS virtualization; Parallels, VMWare, VirtualBox, etc. I require the support for work-related operations. I am hoping the virtualization comes to the ARM-based Macs. At present, I use the iMac via Screen Sharing to run virtual OS sessions.
A new era has started.
My last iPhone purchase was the iPhone 6 Plus back in March, 2015. Late in 2017, I began to notice a drop off in performance and battery life.
My first thought was “I need a new iPhone.”, but, after further review, I determined that I would try a battery replacement instead.
The key component in the “review” was the use of the Coconut Battery app to measure my iPhone battery health. Within the app metrics, I saw that my phone’s battery capacity was diminished substantially and the number of charging cycles was nearly 500 which far outpaces the 200-300 advertised for the normal life span of the battery.
In January of this year, I took my phone to a local Apple repair service U Break I Fix. Twenty minutes and $70 later, I walked out with a “new” iPhone. The performance was back. The battery was back.
Now, as to question of when is good enough good enough? The technology gene in my DNA calls for a new iPhone each time a new one hits the market. The last episode was the recent release of the Big Red One. The frugal side argues that the new iPhone doesn’t give you features that meet the “replacement threshold”.
Now I know the “replacement threshold” is a subjective measure which differs for each individual. The “threshold” is very sensitive to the usage model each person has for the device. My “threshold” has changed over time; drifting from a technology-based measure to a frugal-based measure.
For now, I am not sold on the form factor and function of the iPhone X. And the iPhone 8 Plus is better than my iPhone 6 Plus, but not to the point that I need to replace current function with updated function.
I am anticipating the next few months when the numerous iPhone rumors solidify into reality. What is most intriguing is the adoption of larger screen sizes. At that point, a reassessment may result in a new iPhone, but, for now, Good Enough is definitely Good Enough.
Apple has claimed for years now that a touch screen has no place as part of a laptop or desktop setup. In the last updates for the Apple laptop line, this denial of touch seems to be lessening with the inclusion of a “Touch Bar” to the high-end MacBook Pro models.
The Touch Bar, however seems to be more of a gimmick that falls far short of the “Touch” experience the customer wants.
In a recent post on my TechnoBabble blog, I lamented the failure of Apple to maintain it’s position as “King of Touch”; a prominent position it pioneered with the introduction of the iPhone and iPad. Even I abandoned the Apple brand this Christmas with the purchase of a Microsoft Surface Pro 4. Thanks Santa!
Now a 3rd-party solution appears to be filling the gap. The AirBar may find a welcoming customer pool for we Mac owners desiring the Touch experience. I await the availability of the 13.3″ AirBar to support my MacBook Air.
But this does not let Apple off the hotseat. The company needs to realize that the iPad Pro is a poor substitute for a 2-in-1 experience like the Surface Pro. I would prefer an iPad-like device with true productivity features; USB, microSD card and mini DisplayPort support.
Will it ever happen? Not with the current attitude at the top of Apple. Maybe after a few quarters of falling profits the message may sink in as in “consider the customer. Thinner and lighter can only go so far”.
I have an iPad Air 2 . The iPad Pro is now available. Should I upgrade?
A number of iPad users are asking that same question. There is no stock answer. As with many upgrade decisions, “It all depends” holds true once again.
For myself, my reason for contemplating an upgrade is the addictive desire to be on the cutting edge. I need the new tech because it is new.
But when I step back an review my use of the iPad, I have difficulty justifying the leap forward. My use of the iPad Air 2 is media consumption; email, video, web browsing etc. Not really a productivity thing. In fact, I have never quite worked out a good workflow for use of an iPad as a productivity device. I suppose I am too entrenched in thePC-based paridigm to devise a suitable alternative that incorporates the iPad. Too much “sand boxing” going on, i.e., I want to search for my data, select it and then select the tool I want to use to manipulate the data. I want to share a file among many tools, but I don’t want to be forced to store the file in the “cloud” in order to do so. Sometimes the sun is out and the “cloud” is gone (no wi-fi).
With the iPad Air 2, I get some of the “goodness” in that iOS 9 provides the split screen, multitasking view which I find very useful. The iPad Pro would, in this case, provide more screen real estate for the side-by-side apps. But there’s not really anything else that entices me to make the move.
I say this with a brave face and resolute conviction, but, that adiction is tingling in the shadows of my mind.
Apple rolled out the new 2014 lineup of iPads. The star of the show was the iPad Air 2. With more RAM, faster CPU and GPU, the iPad Air 2 is a step up from the iPad Air.
But what about the iPad mini 3?. The only new feature available on the mini 3 is the Touch ID sensor on the Home button and the addition of the “gold” color scheme. The rest of the specs remained consistent with the previous generation (now called iPad mini 2).
Of the 2014 changes to the mini, the Touch ID is the most compelling. In my estimation, save the money on the iPad mini 3 and buy the mini 2. it appears that the iPhone 6 Plus is weighing heavy in the minds of the Apple folk in Cupertino. There might not be an iPad mini 4.
I have, from time to time, made the attempt to re-task my iPad as a productivity device; my “not a laptop” laptop.
After going through many keyboard configurations (ZAGG, Logitech, Apple, etc.) and any number of productivity apps (Pages, Numbers, KeyNote, Docs TO Go to name a few), I have finally accepted that the iPad is just not a laptop replacement for me.
This is not to say that the iPad could not be used by others for that purpose. The hurtle that I cannot seem to clear is the workflow issues. The sandboxing of the different apps make it difficult for me to achieve the level of productivity I need. Too many years of “drag and drop” between applications I guess.
The iPad can be used as a laptop stand-in for at times, and, with the introduction of iOS 8, perhaps the software is moving into a new phase that would provide more of the workflow model I use.
But, for now, I will use my MacBook Air for the brunt of my mobile work and relegate the iPad to it’s rightful place as an outstanding media consumption device.
Then again, there is a hint of an iPad Pro. Hmmm….
Over the past few years, Apple has embarked on a yearly refresh of Operating System software for both the Mac and iOS lines of hardware. In particular, the release of iOS is tied to the introduction of the latest iPhone arrival each fall. It’s almost biblical. When the leaves begin to show fall colors, a new iPhone is near.
With iOS 7 and again with iOS 8, it is evident that even though the hardware was ready to go, the software was not. This “good enough” release cycle is giving Apple a black eye. While hardware is a science, software continues to be more of an art form. As art, it is most difficult to tie the release of new software to a date certain. Software is ready when it’s ready and not before.
Perhaps the problem is that Apple is overreaching in the feature set and needs to scale back such that the changes needed in the software match the programming resources Apple can deploy to meet the commitments. I would rather have a stable, functional release of iOS rather than a feature-rich environment in which I have to battle the feature set to maintain control of my device.
With iOS 8, we had the initial release, followed closely by version 8.0.1 which, in turn was followed more closely with version 8.0.2 needed to correct issues introduced with 8.0.1. In fact, the first release of iOS 8 should have been version 8.1.
Has Apple adopted the old Microsoft model. Get the OS out there and fix it in Service Pack 1 or 2. Can anyone say “Vista”?
Here’s hoping that Apple returns to the Apple of old and delivers a software experience that matches the hardware it runs on.
